Potency correction? It depends [Regulatives / Guidelines]
❝ ❝ What happens when the assay percentage of Investigational product
❝ ❝ (between test and reference) is more than 5% in conducting a
❝ ❝ Bioequivalence study?
❝
❝ Not a good idea. See one of my lectures concerning the main
❝ assumptions in BE testing:
❝ AUC = Dose × Fraction absorbed / Clearance
❝ This equation holds for both test ...
❝ ... You are not allowed to perform such a calculation, but be sure
❝ that regulators will!
Helmut, full ACK with your points, especially from the teaching point of view
. But sometimes life is more complicated.
And sometimes even regulators are aware of this
.The EMA guidance states under Point 4.1.8 Evaluation page 13:
"In bioequivalence studies, the pharmacokinetic parameters should in general not be adjusted for differences in assayed content of the test and reference batch. However, in exceptional cases where a reference batch with an assay content differing less than 5% from test product cannot be found (see section 4.1.2) content correction could be accepted. If content correction is to be used, this should be pre-specified in the protocol and justified by inclusion of the results from the assay of the test and reference products in the protocol."
Regards,
Detlew
Complete thread:
- Assay percentage, Healthy volunteer, PI raghavendra_s 2010-11-25 04:29
- Assay percentage, Healthy volunteer, PI manan 2010-11-25 10:43
- Assay percentage, healthy volunteers Helmut 2010-11-25 15:44
- Potency correction? It dependsd_labes 2010-11-26 10:38
- THX! Helmut 2010-11-26 14:18
- Assay percentage, healthy volunteers Marcel 2011-06-24 15:19
- Healthy volunteers vs. patients Helmut 2011-06-24 15:40
- Healthy volunteers vs. patients Marcel 2011-06-24 16:03
- Healthy volunteers vs. patients Helmut 2011-06-24 15:40
- Potency correction? It dependsd_labes 2010-11-26 10:38
