Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • EMA's POV on higher order designs

EMA's POV on higher order designs [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut – Vienna, Austria, 2010-06-08 20:25 (5864 d 08:18 ago) – Posting: # 5478
Views: 4,667

Dear ElMaestro,

❝ Isn't there something fishy here?

:lol3:

❝ In your data listing you have period 1..3 but no subject will have more than two readings, so effectively each subject will have a missing value.

Exactly. Please note that the coding was presented by David Brown (MHRA).

❝ Or have I been too long on the seven seas this time?

No!

:pirate:

—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
Helmut Schütz

[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

EMA's POV on higher order designs Helmut 2010-06-08 14:01
- EMA's POV on higher order designs Dr_Dan 2010-06-08 14:36
  - EMA vs. FDA Helmut 2010-06-08 14:50
    - EMA vs. FDA Dr_Dan 2010-06-08 15:01
      - EMA vs. FDA Helmut 2010-06-08 15:28
- EMA's POV on higher order designs ElMaestro 2010-06-08 18:12
  - EMA's POV on higher order designsHelmut 2010-06-08 18:25
    - EMA's POV on higher order designs ElMaestro 2010-06-08 19:15
      - Example data-set Helmut 2010-06-09 17:00
        
        SASophylistic EMA results d_labes 2010-06-16 13:37
        
        SASophylistic EMA results Helmut 2010-06-16 14:18

Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
378 visitors (0 registered, 378 guests [including 27 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:43 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas. Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz