Outlier (tests?) [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by earlybird – 2010-02-09 17:45 (5985 d 05:39 ago) – Posting: # 4739
Views: 7,067

Dear HS,

❝ Almost. TPD wants a test of the studentised residuals


Ok sometimes the small words inbetween are important i.e. "of"

❝ ❝ What about Hotelings T2


❝ Well, that's a multivariate test; what do you want to test here?


This was a suggestion from one of your's previous posts

❝ ❝ Cooks distance, Mahalanobis distance,


❝ Exploratory only, i.e., no tests.


❝ ❝ robust regression,


❝ On what?


ok, I have to check, that again

❝ ❝ Lund' test?


❝ Obsolete, I would say.


❝ ❝ Are these "studentised residual" tests?


❝ As said above we should test the studentised residuals; there's no "studentised residual test".

❝ For identification I use to plot the studentised intra-subject residual vs. the model response and had only two additional reference lines based on the normal distribution (0.05), i.e. at ±1.960. For 0.02 that would transfer to ±2.326. I'm not sure what TPD means by 'degrees of freedom for the design'. Most likely the one of the residual error (n1+n2-2 in 2×2 cross-over).

❝ Examples: n=24, t0.02,22 2.508, n=36 t0.02,34 2.441. But that's no test; multiplicity issues are ignored (can they?)...


so all in all you mean

1. I should ask the Canadian what they mean exactly
2. Wait until the guideline is final?

Greetings,
earlybird

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,571 registered users;
359 visitors (0 registered, 359 guests [including 34 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:24 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It requires a very unusual mind
to undertake the analysis of the obvious.    Alfred North Whitehead

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5