Biowaiver rejected... [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Ahmed meeran – 2006-10-10 16:41 (7197 d 05:40 ago) – Posting: # 302
Views: 9,804

Dear Hermann,

Yes MOH = Ministry of Health. The guidlines which I have referred is from MCC South Africa Dec 2003 version. Of course the guidline on Biowaivers can slightly vary on limits but in my opinion over all the summarised points are important to consider when any BW is sought.

regaffairs though quoted ..but did not spell out on which point exactly the MOH rejected the BW application.. hence I have asked whether the points quoted are taken care enough ... Of course the final decision to grant BW or not is with the MOH.

But if the BW is rejected due any other reason other than I have summarized, if regaffairs can uncover the details so that our group members can be benefited.

With regards,

Ahmed

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
126 visitors (0 registered, 126 guests [including 21 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:22 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5