Steady state assessment [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2008-12-19 16:00 (6401 d 18:29 ago) – Posting: # 2954
Views: 7,396

Dear Nirali!

❝ However as per Canadian guideline, they have recommended RMANOVA with Day and Day*Treatment effects to be considered. Here, I am prefereing to do a ONE WAY ANOVA (as I am considering last three pre-dose).


Have you read my linked slides? The problem with all global assessments is the dichotomous outcome (steady state: yes|no), whereas the regression approach allows exclusion of particular subjects.

❝ Will this approach fulfill the regulatory requirement, as the study is for Europe territory?


Why not? Since there’s no consensus, you must come up with some procedure in the protocol anyhow.
I never had any problems with both of the following methods: Hotelling’s T² and individual regressions.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
314 visitors (0 registered, 314 guests [including 17 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:29 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It requires a very unusual mind
to undertake the analysis of the obvious.    Alfred North Whitehead

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5