Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy Latest Posts Abbreviations

α-adjustments? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Mikkabel – Belgium, 2025-11-04 13:03 (211 d 19:59 ago) – Posting: # 24478
Views: 1,932

Thanks for the clarifications!
it confirms our interpretations of the guidance. Now, we are going to "brainstorm" and choose the best option (Hierarchical or adjustment) as indeed, the N is still acceptable with alpha/2.

Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post #5! [Helmut]

Complete thread:

ICHM13A/Multiple Test Product Studies Mikkabel 2025-11-04 09:46
- α-adjustments? Helmut 2025-11-04 11:15
  - α-adjustments?Mikkabel 2025-11-04 12:03
    - α-adjustments? BEQool 2025-11-09 20:08
      - Beyond Bonferroni… Helmut 2025-11-10 08:56

Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,571 registered users;
462 visitors (0 registered, 462 guests [including 18 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:03 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I’m all in favor of the democratic principle
that one idiot is as good as one genius, but I draw the line
when someone takes the next step and concludes
that two idiots are better than one genius. Leo Szilard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz