ICHM13/High risk products [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Mikkabel – Belgium, 2024-11-21 16:26 (560 d 04:30 ago) – Posting: # 24288
Views: 6,010

Thanks Ohlbe for your advice!

I can understand the potential lack of efficacy if the treatment is taken off label by the patient.
Just for my information, what would be the expectation of the regulators if after having performed the study in fasted state, the test product present an higher BA (but still less than in fed condition) than the comparator demonstrating a less food effect from the test product? Do you think that it will be an issue for the assessor that the BE is not demonstrated in both condition in that case?


Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post #5[Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
133 visitors (0 registered, 133 guests [including 43 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:57 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I’m all in favor of the democratic principle
that one idiot is as good as one genius, but I draw the line
when someone takes the next step and concludes
that two idiots are better than one genius.    Leo Szilard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5