Subject accountability, Proc MIXED or equivalent [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2008-09-02 18:30 (6508 d 13:31 ago) – Posting: # 2306
Views: 28,027

Dear Ohlbe,

❝ I'm not sure I get your point there. In a standard 2x2 cross-over trial, the new version of the guideline would still allow subjects missing one of the two periods to be excluded.


OK. Maybe. If one reads the whole sentence in your interpretation.
In understandable words it would mean "... complete at least two periods ..."
(understandable at least for me :-D ).

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
415 visitors (0 registered, 415 guests [including 16 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:02 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5