Primary pharmacodynamic bioequivalence [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2021-11-19 17:22 (1683 d 04:31 ago) – Posting: # 22677
Views: 3,551

Hi ceylan,

❝ For PK bioequivalence, 90% confidence interval is ok both for US and EMA.


❝ For PD bioequivalence, I want to ask about the confidence interval for US and EMA?

❝ Is it 90% CI for US and 95% CI for EMA?


❝ And in what circumstances, 90 % CI and / or 95 % CI are being used?


I think the question is a little too general.
Sometimes regulators want a 95% CI other times they want a 90% CI.
Here's a case of a 95% CI being used.
Here's a case of 90% CI being used.

Whatever you do, if you need PD I recommend to go for a scientific advice. Ask about 90% vs 95% if there is nothing written in a guideline. Don't make assumptions and don't take chances.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
202 visitors (0 registered, 202 guests [including 52 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:54 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5