Acceptance criteria of analytical run [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by qualityassurance – 2021-10-19 17:25 (1705 d 23:38 ago) – Posting: # 22641
Views: 5,887

Dear dshah, ElMaestro and Ohlbe,

Thank you for the response.

Further the CRO's SOP is equally important as many times the SOP's are stringent compared to guideline (to keep a single SOP for many regulaotries).

May we specify in our SOP that 2/3 (67%) of the QC should be within ±15% of the nominal values? or It is advisable to reject such runs (having 66.67% passed QCs)?

Regards,
Qualityassurance

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
114 visitors (0 registered, 114 guests [including 19 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:03 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5