Potency Correction (EMEA) [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2008-08-15 15:11 (6528 d 13:58 ago) – Posting: # 2191
Views: 7,704

Dear Joy,

first see this post. A potency correction was one of the discussion points for the revison of the guideline (the draft was adopted on July 24th, 2008 by EMEA's CHMP - see this post).
Since the potency correction was dropped from WHO's guideline in 2006, don't expect it in the drafted EU-guideline. From personal communications with members of the EWP/PK group I reconstruct the argument against a correction as follows:
  > The analytical method has some documented variability.
  > It's possible in a fraudulent way to reanalyse the study's IMPs after the biostudy was evaluated
    until by simple chance their content will come up in such a way that it would 'safe' an already
    failed study.
Although a prerequisite of BE is GMP (including documented release of IMPs) which should prevent such a thing, that's the currenty thinking in the EU (paranoia? In practice in Canada since 1992). :-(
For details join the party of people waiting for the draft to be published on EMEA's website.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,571 registered users;
285 visitors (0 registered, 285 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:10 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Try to learn something about everything
and everything about something.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5