NTI drugs with moderate to high variability [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2015-12-10 09:47 (3849 d 14:20 ago) – Posting: # 15716
Views: 3,997

Hi arl_stat.

❝ The BE criteria for NTI drugs is 90-111%.


That's only true if you aim for Europe (EMA) or regulatory bodies which use similar recommendations.

For the FDA the story is different. They recommend RSABE for NTIDs. Search the forums category [RSABE / ABEL] or search the whole forum for "FDA NTID".

❝ It is expected to have a low variability for NTI drugs.


Not always. See f.i. this post with at least moderate variabilities for Cmax of NTIDs.

❝ What is the BE criteria for known NTI drugs who possess moderate to high variability?


The EMA doesn't make a distinction based on variability in their NTID criteria.

For the FDA the story is again different.
See the warfarin guidance for NTIDs with low variability.

See the dabigatran guidance for NTIDs with moderate to high variabilities. See also this thread wich discussed that topic.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
118 visitors (0 registered, 118 guests [including 22 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:08 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5