BE Study within development - between phase II and phase III [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2008-01-03 15:09 (6753 d 22:53 ago) – Posting: # 1458
Views: 3,256

Dear Anne,

if at least one of the acceptance limits was exceeded by a CL, probably your sample size was too small - consider repeating the study.
If a point estimate (geometric mean ratio) was outside the acceptance range, I'm afraid that you will have to reformulate in such a case... (theoretically this might also happen by chance alone - but a PE outside the AR is a rather strong hint of problems with the formulation) :crying:

The only exception I remember was a task force lead by Larry Lesko (FDA/CDER) a couple of years ago.
If the BE study between the formulation used in phase III and the finally to be marketed formulation failed, FDA looked at the submitted safety and efficacy data. If the tested formulation failed due to exceeding the upper acceptance range and data of higher dose level(s) supported no safety problems, the MA was granted. An analogous procedure was applied to the lower acceptance range and efficacy data of lower dose level(s). These decisions were made on a case-by-case basis.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
182 visitors (0 registered, 182 guests [including 22 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:03 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Try to learn something about everything
and everything about something.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5