Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Update: S×F variance test [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by jag009 – NJ, 2014-12-18 16:31 (4204 d 18:13 ago) – Posting: # 14111
Views: 16,002

Hi Angus,

❝ Thanks for the update: SAS will give a very similar result. According to Helmut SAS assigns 0 to negative variance values and we see this in the post from India. We have to keep in mind that this data set is simulated and this is surely the source of the problem?

What value did you arrive at for the degree of freedom (n-s) used to calculate the 95 CI? I am getting something like 67. Yes, with the same EMA dataset.

Thanks
John

Thread locked

Complete thread:

Concerta Guidance: Sub x Form interaction variance test jag009 2014-12-05 20:57
- Concerta Guidance: Sub x Form interaction variance test AngusMcLean 2014-12-06 01:28
  - Concerta Guidance: Sub x Form interaction variance test Helmut 2014-12-06 01:53
    - Concerta Guidance: Sub x Form interaction variance test jag009 2014-12-07 20:58
      - Concerta Guidance: S×F variance test AngusMcLean 2014-12-08 01:35
        
        Concerta Guidance: S×F variance test Helmut 2014-12-08 14:12
        
        Update: S×F variance test jag009 2014-12-08 17:40
        
        Update: S×F variance test AngusMcLean 2014-12-08 18:09
        
        EMA’s dataset I Helmut 2014-12-08 18:18
        
        EMA’s dataset I AngusMcLean 2014-12-08 19:55
        
        Update: S×F variance test jag009 2014-12-08 20:41
        
        Update: S×F variance test AngusMcLean 2014-12-08 18:18
        
        Question jag009 2014-12-10 17:01
        
        Question AngusMcLean 2014-12-10 18:34
        
        Update: S×F variance test kumarnaidu 2014-12-09 06:48
        
        Update: S×F variance test jag009 2014-12-09 15:16
        
        Update: S×F variance test AngusMcLean 2014-12-09 17:47
        
        Update: S×F variance test jag009 2014-12-09 18:01
        
        Update: S×F variance test AngusMcLean 2014-12-09 18:30
        
        Update: S×F variance testjag009 2014-12-18 15:31
        
        Update: S×F variance test AngusMcLean 2014-12-18 16:12
        
        Update: S×F variance test jag009 2014-12-22 17:28
        
        Update: S×F variance test AngusMcLean 2014-12-22 19:32
        
        Update: S×F variance test jag009 2014-12-22 20:19
        
        Update: S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-22 20:45
        
        Update: S×F variance jag009 2014-12-22 20:51
        
        Update: S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-22 21:10
        Update: S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-22 21:36
        
        Update: S×F variance jag009 2014-12-22 22:18
        
        Update: S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-22 23:26
        
        Update: S×F variance jag009 2014-12-23 04:43
        
        Update: S×F variance AngusMcLean 2014-12-23 15:24
        
        Update: S×F variance test AngusMcLean 2014-12-09 21:03
        
        Coding Helmut 2014-12-09 18:49
        
        working.... jag009 2014-12-09 22:24
- Concerta Guidance: S×F variance test ElMaestro 2014-12-06 11:12
  - Concerta Guidance: S×F variance test AngusMcLean 2014-12-07 14:32
    - Concerta Guidance: S×F variance test ElMaestro 2014-12-07 18:08
      - Concerta Guidance: S×F variance test AngusMcLean 2014-12-07 23:13
        
        Concerta Guidance: S×F variance test ElMaestro 2014-12-08 12:25
        
        Concerta Guidance: S×F variance test nobody 2014-12-08 13:44
        Concerta Guidance: S×F variance test AngusMcLean 2014-12-08 14:03
        
        Concerta Guidance:S×F variance test nobody 2014-12-08 14:32

Update: S×F vari­­ance test [Regulatives / Guidelines]

Complete thread:

Update: S×F variance test [Regulatives / Guidelines]