Validity of BE [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Dr_Dan  – Germany, 2014-10-23 11:24 (4266 d 04:46 ago) – Posting: # 13773
Views: 2,921

Dear wien-ui
As Helmut explained there are some risks that an old BE study does not meet current requirements. However, there is a different approach to get a marketing authorisation but to start a new application (=new product). I guess the product is already marketed and hence safety and efficacy is given as shown by the pharmacovigilance system. Therefore it should be possible to plan a MRP (=already marketed product). This procedure should not fail since the already marketed product is well established and it is in the interest of the RMS to promote this product otherwise this would mean that the RMS authorised a product in former times that could present possible risk to public health. In consequence this would mean that all products will Need new BE studies which is absurd. Once you got your marketet authorisation you can not lose it because BE requirement changed and you started a new procedure. So it is the dilemma of the RMS to promote you product and if you have a strong RMS this will work for you. We made this experience with several products and only needed to give a reasonable Explanation why missing ISR does not matter.
I hope this helps
Kind regards
Dr_Dan

Kind regards and have a nice day
Dr_Dan

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
343 visitors (0 registered, 343 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:10 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5