Naproxen ER FDA guidance [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by sunny – 2014-04-25 04:43 (4447 d 00:52 ago) – Posting: # 12893
Views: 4,290

(edited on 2014-04-25 10:10)

I think the issue here is how critical the early exposure is. If early exposure is not so important based ER product's approved indications, the partial AUC may not be justified. In the case of methylphenidate and ambien, early exposure is extremely important for the onset of effect (inducing focusing and inducing sleep, respectively). In my view, the early exposure of naproxen is a little difficult to be justified. I would like to hear my thoughts from you all.

Thanks,
Sunny


Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post! [Dr_Dan]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,572 registered users;
379 visitors (0 registered, 379 guests [including 27 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:36 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5