the basis of T/R in the Pro­tocol [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2014-03-14 16:01 (4491 d 06:15 ago) – Posting: # 12629
Views: 9,140

Hi Mittyri,

❝ ❝ If I have information about a larger deviation from a pilot study I use it.

❝ Do you insert any links to the publications about these pilot studies (may be for another market)?


By “pilot” I meant studies the sponsor performed or have access to in an acquired dossier. Only such studies can be assesses for the quality of data (clinical performance, bioanalytics, …). Studies from the literature should be used with caution.

❝ Would you rest the T/R Ratio in the protocol without explanation?


No.

❝ Is it important to the Assessor to know - where do you get this ratio or why are you assuming such ratio?


I think we have to distinguish between assessing the protocol (authority, IEC)* and the report.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,571 registered users;
317 visitors (0 registered, 317 guests [including 17 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:16 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It requires a very unusual mind
to undertake the analysis of the obvious.    Alfred North Whitehead

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5