BE for HVD (EMA) [Regulatives / Guidelines]
Hi Folks,
Thank you all for this. I beleive Cmax (a single point in PK profile) but not AUC (all points in PK profile) limits widened since is more sensetive to high CV than AUC.
Nasir
Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post! [Ohlbe]
Thank you all for this. I beleive Cmax (a single point in PK profile) but not AUC (all points in PK profile) limits widened since is more sensetive to high CV than AUC.
Nasir
Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post! [Ohlbe]
Complete thread:
- BE for HVD (EMA) nasir 2014-02-14 06:38
- BE for HVD (EMA): no 2x2 crossover d_labes 2014-02-14 09:27
- CV >30% in the study Helmut 2014-02-14 14:35
- BE for HVD (EMA) kvgreddy06 2014-02-14 16:18
- BE for HVD (EMA) PK_Lover 2014-02-14 18:37
- EMA: No widening of acceptance limits for AUC d_labes 2014-02-14 20:03
- BE for HVD (EMA) Helmut 2014-02-15 15:10
- BE for HVD (EMA)nasir 2014-02-18 07:24
- Single point metric… Helmut 2014-02-18 13:03
- Single point metric… nasir 2014-02-18 19:57
- Single point metric… Helmut 2014-02-18 20:38
- Single point metric… nasir 2014-02-19 07:09
- MR GL – when? Helmut 2014-02-19 13:10
- Single point metric… nasir 2014-02-19 07:09
- Single point metric… Helmut 2014-02-18 20:38
- Single point metric… nasir 2014-02-18 19:57
- Single point metric… Helmut 2014-02-18 13:03
- BE for HVD (EMA)nasir 2014-02-18 07:24
- BE for HVD (EMA) PK_Lover 2014-02-14 18:37
- BE for HVD (EMA): no 2x2 crossover d_labes 2014-02-14 09:27
