EMA: No widening of acceptance limits for AUC [Regulatives / Guidelines]
Dear PK_Lover,
I'm not quite sure if this gets the point. I have the impression that this decision was driven purely by 'political' reasons (Whatever these reasons were
).
If it were due to some 'scientific' reasons I would not understand why the FDA does allow widening (or better said scaled ABE) also for AUC.
❝ I would say that it is because a wider difference in AUC is considered clinically relevant.
I'm not quite sure if this gets the point. I have the impression that this decision was driven purely by 'political' reasons (Whatever these reasons were
).If it were due to some 'scientific' reasons I would not understand why the FDA does allow widening (or better said scaled ABE) also for AUC.
—
Regards,
Detlew
Regards,
Detlew
Complete thread:
- BE for HVD (EMA) nasir 2014-02-14 06:38
- BE for HVD (EMA): no 2x2 crossover d_labes 2014-02-14 09:27
- CV >30% in the study Helmut 2014-02-14 14:35
- BE for HVD (EMA) kvgreddy06 2014-02-14 16:18
- BE for HVD (EMA) PK_Lover 2014-02-14 18:37
- EMA: No widening of acceptance limits for AUCd_labes 2014-02-14 20:03
- BE for HVD (EMA) Helmut 2014-02-15 15:10
- BE for HVD (EMA) nasir 2014-02-18 07:24
- Single point metric… Helmut 2014-02-18 13:03
- Single point metric… nasir 2014-02-18 19:57
- Single point metric… Helmut 2014-02-18 20:38
- Single point metric… nasir 2014-02-19 07:09
- MR GL – when? Helmut 2014-02-19 13:10
- Single point metric… nasir 2014-02-19 07:09
- Single point metric… Helmut 2014-02-18 20:38
- Single point metric… nasir 2014-02-18 19:57
- Single point metric… Helmut 2014-02-18 13:03
- BE for HVD (EMA) nasir 2014-02-18 07:24
- BE for HVD (EMA) PK_Lover 2014-02-14 18:37
- BE for HVD (EMA): no 2x2 crossover d_labes 2014-02-14 09:27
