Draft FDA Guidance Dec 2013 [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by kvgreddy06 – India, 2014-02-14 17:44 (4515 d 04:50 ago) – Posting: # 12428
Views: 15,742

Hi,

"A replicate crossover study may be an appropriate alternative to the parallel or nonreplicate crossover study described above, and can be conducted as either a partial (three-way) or full (four-way) replication of treatment".

how can we replace parallel study by a partial (three-way) or full (four-way) replication? in case of long half life drugs.

In case of warfarine OGD guidlines.

http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM201283.pdf

Warfarin has a long terminal elimination half-life. Please ensure adequate washout periods between treatments in the crossover studies. For long half-life drug products, an AUC truncated to 72 hours may be used in place of AUC0-t or AUC0-∞, as described in the Guidance for Industry: “Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies for Orally Administered Drug Products – General Considerations”.

Warfarin has low within subject variability",- In OGD itself showing low variability then why suggesting RSAB (i.e. NTI)

Applicants may consider using the reference-scaled average bioequivalence approach for warfarin described below.

warfarine has long half life, FDA suggesting RSAB- ?

Bioequivalence Studies with Pharmacokinetic Endpoints for Drugs Submitted Under an ANDA": in this guidence there is no disscussion about NTI drugs.


Thanks.
KVGR

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
392 visitors (0 registered, 392 guests [including 37 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:35 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Ignorance more frequently begets confidence
than does knowledge.    Charles Darwin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5