To round or not to round… [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2014-02-06 02:38 (4526 d 16:19 ago) – Posting: # 12350
Views: 2,737

Hi Angus,

❝ In future I think I will round my exact times to two decimals, since I think that is enough. I will then perform PK data analysis using the rounded numbers.


❝ Do agree that 2 decimals for times is OK...yes?


I feel that if sampling times are recorded to ±1 minute rounding hours to two decimals is too “granular”. Time is the independent variable in PK, so I would not apply aggressive rounding. Another idea: Use minutes rather than hours for time. In Phoenix you can have an additional column keeping hours in full precision. Calculate AUCs as [minutes × mass / volume] and divide just once at the end by 60. In the tables show minutes and in the plots use the hour-column. What ’bout that?

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
207 visitors (0 registered, 207 guests [including 21 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:57 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5