FDA: Prasugrel [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by intuitivepharma – India, 2013-12-24 07:38 (4572 d 01:41 ago) – Posting: # 12100
Views: 30,963

Dear Helmut,

Thanks for the reply. In such a precarious situation my only hope to defend the ANDA would be based on the following assumptions.

The guidance recommendations are nonbinding
The demonstration of bioequivalence to an active metabolite is more “closer” to the actual clinical situation than demonstration of bioequivalence to an inactive metabolite.

Can any one let know why for Prasugrel, bioequivalence is based on inactive metabolite and active metabolite PK is submitted as supportive data. The condition that data on active metabolite is required implies that it can be quantified. Enlighten me if I am missing some thing over here.

Thanks & Regards,
IP.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,571 registered users;
277 visitors (0 registered, 277 guests [including 17 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:20 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Try to learn something about everything
and everything about something.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5