No dissolution? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-10-03 15:01 (4646 d 10:11 ago) – Posting: # 11596
Views: 3,837

Hi Tina!

❝ […] Being a solution, dissolution wasnt done.


Hhm, I don’t know whether regulators would accept that. For an example see


Hu J, Kyad A, Ku V, Zhou P, and N Cauchon
A Comparison of Dissolution Testing on Lipid Soft Gelatin Capsules Using USP Apparatus 2 and Apparatus 4
Diss Technol 12(2), 6–9 (2005)
free online resource


❝ Is there any possibility of applying the biowaiver/bibliograhic route…


A biowaiver is based on an in vitro comparison, which you haven’t done.

❝ …considering the fact the invivo BE is unlikely to be shown (just hypothesis)?


You have no in vitro similarity and hypothesize (!) that you will not have in vivo BE – why do you think you will get an approval?

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
168 visitors (0 registered, 168 guests [including 40 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:12 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Competence, like truth, beauty and contact lenses,
is in the eye of the beholder.    Laurence J. Peter

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5