EMA: parent whenever possible [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by mittyri  – Russia, 2013-09-20 16:55 (4657 d 20:30 ago) – Posting: # 11534
Views: 32,107

Dear Ohlbe, Helmut & ALL,

❝ Also for inactive prodrugs, demonstration of bioequivalence for parent compound is recommended. The active metabolite does not need to be measured.


Could you explain why the bioequivalence guideline states that?
If we have an inactive parent compound and active metabolite, wouldn't it be logical to measure active metabolite only?

There is some different recommendation at russian GL:
If the drug substance couldn’t be detected in blood as a result of presystemic elimination and/or doesn’t possess biological activity (pro-drug), than the concentration of biologically active metabolite must be detected.

So could you explain this disrepancy?

Kind regards,
Mittyri

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,572 registered users;
255 visitors (0 registered, 255 guests [including 147 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:25 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists cannot simply hang their subjectivities
up on a hook outside the laboratory door.    Ruth Bleier

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5