Log in
RegisterFDA draft BMV guidance revision published [Regulatives / Guidelines]
posted by Helmut 
– Vienna, Austria, 2013-09-12 18:22 (4668 d 01:45 ago) – Posting: # 11487
Views: 3,744
Dear Ohlbe,
THX!
Wow, that’s an improvement. Still requiring recovery (what for?). At least they have managed to copypaste carryover from EMA’s GL.
7% ISRs, why not. Suggesting to run even a pilot study – not a bad idea.
Comments until 12 December 2013 to www.regulations.gov (see also “Tips for Submitting Effective Comments”).
THX!
❝ […] for a 90-day consultation period.
Wow, that’s an improvement. Still requiring recovery (what for?). At least they have managed to copypaste carryover from EMA’s GL.
7% ISRs, why not. Suggesting to run even a pilot study – not a bad idea.Comments until 12 December 2013 to www.regulations.gov (see also “Tips for Submitting Effective Comments”).
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
Helmut Schütz
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- FDA draft BMV guidance revision published Ohlbe 2013-09-12 15:44
![[Mix]](https://static.bebac.at/img/mix.png "open in Mix view")
- FDA draft BMV guidance revision publishedHelmut 2013-09-12 16:22
- FDA draft BMV guidance revision published ElMaestro 2013-09-12 17:23
- Crystal City 5 Ohlbe 2013-09-25 22:34
- BLQ = 0?! Helmut 2013-09-25 23:15
- Deadline approaching Helmut 2013-12-04 22:02
Ing. Helmut Schütz