Conservative study planning [Regulatives / Guidelines]
Hi Kumar,
More important: same formulation?
“Power of the study” is meaningless. It might be that they planned for a larger deviation of test from reference and lower CV than what was later observed in the study. In order words, the study passed more or less by chance (i.e., with a higher producer’s risk).
I would suggest to base study planning on your own results (you have little information from the literature about side conditions which have an impact on the variability: food, posture, analytical method, …). I would also suggest to be conservative and use the upper confidence limit of the CV, which for the second study is 29.7%.
❝ We have conducted two fed studies for a particular molecule,…
More important: same formulation?
❝ From earlier published studies we found that they have conducted the study for N=30 subjects with CV: 33 and the study was passed but they are not talking about the power of the study.
“Power of the study” is meaningless. It might be that they planned for a larger deviation of test from reference and lower CV than what was later observed in the study. In order words, the study passed more or less by chance (i.e., with a higher producer’s risk).
❝ Now we want to conduct another study for the same molecule then should we go with the study 2 conducted by us or with the literature with high CV of 33%.
I would suggest to base study planning on your own results (you have little information from the literature about side conditions which have an impact on the variability: food, posture, analytical method, …). I would also suggest to be conservative and use the upper confidence limit of the CV, which for the second study is 29.7%.
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- Sample size vasup 2013-07-29 08:37
- Sample size ElMaestro 2013-07-29 10:00
- Sample size jag009 2013-07-29 15:57
- Overpowering Helmut 2013-07-30 15:51
- Overpowering ElMaestro 2013-07-30 16:37
- Overpowering jag009 2013-07-30 16:45
- Overpowering ElMaestro 2013-07-30 16:51
- Overpowering jag009 2013-08-01 20:08
- Overpowering kumarnaidu 2013-09-02 12:22
- Conservative study planningHelmut 2013-09-02 12:42
- Conservative study planning kumarnaidu 2013-09-02 14:36
- Conservative study planning Ohlbe 2013-09-02 18:44
- confidence limit of the CV Jay 2013-09-06 13:55
- CL of CV Helmut 2013-09-06 15:02
- CL of CV Jay 2013-09-06 15:21
- CL of CV Helmut 2013-09-06 15:42
- PE consideration Jay 2013-09-11 11:02
- PE consideration Dr_Dan 2013-09-11 12:07
- PE consideration Jay 2013-09-11 13:09
- PE consideration kumarnaidu 2013-09-11 13:22
- Sockpuppet? Helmut 2013-09-11 14:13
- PE consideration kumarnaidu 2013-09-12 13:04
- PE consideration Dr_Dan 2013-09-11 12:07
- PE consideration Jay 2013-09-11 11:02
- CL of CV Helmut 2013-09-06 15:42
- CL of CV Jay 2013-09-06 15:21
- CL of CV Helmut 2013-09-06 15:02
- Conservative study planning kumarnaidu 2013-09-02 14:36
- Conservative study planningHelmut 2013-09-02 12:42
- Overpowering kumarnaidu 2013-09-02 12:22
- Overpowering jag009 2013-08-01 20:08
- Overpowering ElMaestro 2013-07-30 16:51
- Overpowering jag009 2013-07-30 16:45
- Overpowering ElMaestro 2013-07-30 16:37
