Very strange! [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2013-08-05 19:52 (4708 d 11:14 ago) – Posting: # 11213
Views: 6,305

Hi Luvbloom,

❝ By the way did you checked Watson's approval. They did studies on 60 and 30 mg istead of 90 and 60 mg and they have not claimed for 90 mg.


Going there now...

Did you look at my post "strange"? What do you think? But was Waton's nifedipine for Adalat CC or Procardia XL? If for adalat CC, since the 60 mg is the RLD listed then I guess they can run studies on 60 and 30mg only to file. But that particular guidance is really strange, asking for fasting (can be HVD design) on 90mg, 2x2x2 on fed on 90mg and 2x2x2 fast on 60mg. I don't get the logic..

John

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
324 visitors (0 registered, 324 guests [including 17 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:06 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Don’t compromise yourself.
You are all you’ve got.    Janis Joplin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5