Very strange! [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-08-05 18:37 (4705 d 21:27 ago) – Posting: # 11209
Views: 6,265

Hi John,

❝ […] FDA wants 3 studies, 2 of which are RSABE studies on 90 mg the RLD, and 1 fasting on 60 mg (? It's not RLD, huh?) So 90 mg is HVD and 60 mg is not HVD?


60 mg not RLD is strange indeed. I guess you misinterpreted the guidance. For the 60 mg fasting study I read: “Additional Comments: Please see comments [sic] above.“ Since they cannot mean the comment on fed studies, this leaves only the 90 mg fasting study with a reference to the progesterone guidance (=HVD…).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
107 visitors (0 registered, 107 guests [including 18 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:05 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5