BE using non RLD [Regulatives / Guidelines]
Hi lb,
Sounds very fishy to me. I think it would render the FDA liable if the originator sues the FDA as a means of brand protection. Was this one of the cases where an originator RLD was not available, perhaps?
❝ Done that (submitted an ANDA with a BE on non RLD lower strength) for a highly variable statin and also got approval (along with bio-waiver for all the proportional lower strengths).
Sounds very fishy to me. I think it would render the FDA liable if the originator sues the FDA as a means of brand protection. Was this one of the cases where an originator RLD was not available, perhaps?
—
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
Complete thread:
- BE using non RLD zheng791 2013-08-03 21:45
- BE using non RLD ElMaestro 2013-08-03 22:17
- BE using non RLD jag009 2013-08-03 22:51
- BE using non RLD zheng791 2013-08-03 23:55
- BE using non RLD jag009 2013-08-04 20:20
- BE using non RLD luvblooms 2013-08-05 05:57
- BE using non RLDElMaestro 2013-08-05 10:44
- BE using non RLD luvblooms 2013-08-05 13:46
- BE using non RLD ElMaestro 2013-08-05 13:59
- BE using non RLD luvblooms 2013-08-05 14:31
- BE using non RLD ElMaestro 2013-08-05 15:04
- Very strange! jag009 2013-08-05 16:02
- Very strange! Helmut 2013-08-05 16:37
- Very strange! jag009 2013-08-05 16:45
- Very strange! luvblooms 2013-08-05 17:30
- Very strange! jag009 2013-08-05 17:52
- Very strange! Helmut 2013-08-05 16:37
- BE using non RLD luvblooms 2013-08-05 14:31
- BE using non RLD ElMaestro 2013-08-05 13:59
- BE using non RLD luvblooms 2013-08-05 13:46
- BE using non RLDElMaestro 2013-08-05 10:44
- BE using non RLD luvblooms 2013-08-05 05:57
- BE using non RLD jag009 2013-08-04 20:20
- BE using non RLD zheng791 2013-08-03 23:55
- BE using non RLD jag009 2013-08-03 22:51
- BE using non RLD ElMaestro 2013-08-03 22:17
