Population BE for in-vitro data [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by krishna – India, 2013-06-19 14:03 (4760 d 03:35 ago) – Posting: # 10815
Views: 5,271

(edited on 2013-06-20 08:46)

❝ As per the above FDA guidline for in-vitro PBE, it was mentioned (page no. 4) that point estiamate should fall in (90 - 111). But from the recent Budesonide suspension OGD guidance http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/.../Guidances/UCM319977.pdf, there is no such criteria except the 95% Upper bound < =0. What is the rationale behind this, can any body clarify me? As per my understanding, point estimate criteria drive the results in a good way like scaled average bio equivalence. Correct me if I am wrong.



Hi all,

As per my knowledge, point estimate criteria prevents not to shift the mean ratio too far from 1.


Thanks,

Krishna.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
211 visitors (0 registered, 211 guests [including 31 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:38 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Try to learn something about everything
and everything about something.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5