§10(1) TO 10(3) shift due to altered BE results [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Shuanghe  – Spain, 2013-05-27 17:47 (4778 d 14:09 ago) – Posting: # 10665
Views: 1,972

Hi Tina,

❝ I am currently working on an IR generic product.The reference comparator SPC mentions no information of PK differences and meals. SD fed and fasted study was conducted for EU submission.


According to EMA's guideline, for IR formulation if the reference, according to its SPC, can be taken irrespective of meal (I assume this is the case based on your description) then only 1 fasting study would be enough. I'm interested to know why you did fed study as well? :confused:

As for your question ElMaestro has already answered.

All the best,
Shuanghe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
361 visitors (0 registered, 361 guests [including 18 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:56 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Don’t compromise yourself.
You are all you’ve got.    Janis Joplin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5