§10(1) TO 10(3) shift due to altered BE results [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Tina – India, 2013-05-24 20:02 (4783 d 13:13 ago) – Posting: # 10647
Views: 2,531

Dear all,

I am currently working on an IR generic product.The reference comparator SPC mentions no information of PK differences and meals. SD fed and fasted study was conducted for EU submission. The fasted study failed while the fed study passed. Though the product was developed as a generic 10(1), can the difference observed in the result be submitted as hybrid generic application and have specific wording in the SPC for taking the generic developed product with or after meals? Is this option acceptable? Thank you for your comments

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
287 visitors (0 registered, 287 guests [including 17 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:16 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5