"Meth" - apologies [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2013-04-22 22:03 (4811 d 16:16 ago) – Posting: # 10463
Views: 17,087

Hi again,

❝ Good guess. Not exactly meth (that was the story at the end of this post), but close. Remember the recent Two-Stage thread?


Jawohl; I apologise for that abbreviation - I actually meant meth█████ which I have seen have quite low intra-CVs in IR formulations. In the world of inhalation I also occasionally see meth used as acronym for methacholine. It is used to provoke artifical asthma attacks in volunteers. Wonderful stuff - crossover studies now and then have a lot of subjects who mysteriously don't feel like showing up for period 2 :-D


Edit: Your guess was exactly right. However, I blacked it out (not sure whether the sponsor wants to see it in public right now). Low CVs also for all MR formulations – unless you go for the first pAUC (not to speak about EMA’s invention pCmax,1). :angry:

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
131 visitors (0 registered, 131 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:19 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The great tragedy of Science – the slaying
of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5