Yes, but why? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-04-22 14:53 (4811 d 21:33 ago) – Posting: # 10453
Views: 4,345

Hi Chirag!

❝ We are planning to conduct a reference - replicate design study as per USFDA requirements for submission to Health Canada.


Already knowing differences in regulatory requirements what’s the point to plan a study according to country A’s guidance(s) for submission to country B? :confused:

Canada currently does not accept reference-scaling for HVDs/HVDPs – which is the main purpose of replicate designs. If you want to submit the study later on to the FDA as well you can use a replicate design (Health Canada TPD guidance Section 2.3.1)

Replicated cross-over designs may also be used, where the formulations are tested more than once in the same subjects.

and evaluate it by conventional (unscaled) ABE. Make sure to power the study for Canada’s requirements: 90% CI of AUC within 80-125%, PE of Cmax within 80–125% (see also this thread).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
137 visitors (0 registered, 137 guests [including 23 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:27 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The great tragedy of Science – the slaying
of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5