Dosage form Proportionality [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-04-19 17:05 (4814 d 22:28 ago) – Posting: # 10439
Views: 2,756

Dear Pravin!

❝ Any one will clarify me about Dosage form proportionality studies, its criteria, regulatory requirment and statistical methods for the same.


Please [image] search the forum in the future.
I don’t know of any regulatory requirements for dose-prop. studies (except that you have to provide data for NCEs in NDAs). If you want to apply for a dose-proportionality biowaiver in the context of BE, EMA accepts ±25% of dose-normalized AUCs from the literature (GL Section 4.1.6).
If you want to set up a confirmatory study: Cross-over of ≥3 strengths and define one – commonly the highest – strength as the reference. Assess CIs of dose-normalized AUCs. In my (European) experience regulators want a to see a multiplicity adjustment in order to keep the overall patient’s risk at ≤5%. Maybe this lecture helps. See also slides 100–101 of another lecture about multiplicity.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
133 visitors (0 registered, 133 guests [including 19 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:34 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The great tragedy of Science – the slaying
of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5