ratio = difference of logs! [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-03-11 02:17 (4849 d 09:25 ago) – Posting: # 10181
Views: 35,997

Dear Chirag,

❝ […] does this apply to the untransformed or Ln transformed data


❝ The ratios were fine with the Ln transformed data.


Raw data! You need the ln-transformed data only in the BE-statistics. You would have to calculate the difference of logs and backtransform to get % covered. Example:

AUCt 375, AUC 500, covered: 100×375/500=75%.
lnAUCt 5.9269, lnAUC 6.2146, covered: 100×ℯ5.9269–6.2146=75%.

A ratio of logs (95.37%) is nonsense.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
176 visitors (0 registered, 176 guests [including 37 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:42 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5