AUCt not covering at least 80% of AUCinf [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ratnakar1811 – India, 2013-03-06 09:50 (4863 d 12:48 ago) – Posting: # 10157
Views: 37,040

Dear d_labes/forum members,

Yes, in more than 20% of observations AUCinf has been extrapolated for more than 20% and i have received a query from EMA to discuss the validity of the study.

I am just thinking what all points should be considered for the justification and further is there any way by which it can be justified?

Best Regards,

Ratnakar

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
245 visitors (0 registered, 245 guests [including 40 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:39 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5