Median tmax [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-02-19 18:49 (4875 d 07:26 ago) – Posting: # 10063
Views: 11,197

Hi John,

are you are collector of ambiguities in guidances?

❝ For subjects who experience emesis post dose. The guideline stated emesis within 2x median Tmax. Can one use mean Tmax instead if the median value is not available?


Let’s see the [image] wording:

Data deletion due to vomiting:

So what’s “median tmax? IMHO, there are two interpretations possible:
  1. \(\small{\widetilde{t_\text{max}}}\) as stated in the RLD’s label. If have never seen it – only the bloody arithmetic mean \(\small{\overline{t_\text{max}}}\). In most cases the label gives a verbatim statement about the time of the maximum concentrations. In most NDAs only the mean is given. :not really:
    In European SmPCs and/or EPARs you find the \(\small{\widetilde{t_\text{max}}}\) sometimes.
  2. The [image] of tmax-values after the reference in the study – without the subject who vomited.
In my protocols I use #1 (if the median is known) or #2 otherwise. I don’t use [image] (bad stat’s).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
414 visitors (0 registered, 414 guests [including 22 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:15 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Don’t compromise yourself.
You are all you’ve got.    Janis Joplin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5