Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • Stupidity

Stupidity [Nonparametrics]

posted by Helmut – Vienna, Austria, 2010-09-17 15:10 (5401 d 07:32 ago) – Posting: # 5923
Views: 24,510

Dear Martin!

❝ [...] It's a probability that a randomly selected subject with R has a larger t_max value than a randomly selected subject with T (no effect would be indicated by a relative effect of 0.5).

Oh, I see! I mixed up probability with the size of the effect. But regulators are only interested in the latter!

—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

tmax in case of ties: R vs. R vs. SAS d_labes 2010-09-10 12:05
- tmax in case of ties: StatXact, Phoenix, and... Helmut 2010-09-10 18:28
  - Ties, no ties, ties, no ties ... d_labes 2010-09-13 13:21
    - simulation martin 2010-09-14 08:33
      - simulants of the world unite d_labes 2010-09-15 10:14
        
        simulants of the world unite martin 2010-09-15 14:53
        
        simulants of the world unite Helmut 2010-09-15 16:17
        
        simul ants with no ties d_labes 2010-09-16 11:19
        
        simul ants with no ties Helmut 2010-09-16 14:01
        
        two different approaches martin 2010-09-16 15:35
- evaluation of tmax: use of relative effects? martin 2010-09-16 18:04
  - Not positive about that Helmut 2010-09-16 19:52
    - Not positive about that martin 2010-09-16 21:00
      - StupidityHelmut 2010-09-17 13:10
- tmax in case of ties: R vs. R vs. SAS Jack 2010-09-20 14:03
  - R packages Helmut 2010-09-20 14:20
    - R packages code d_labes 2010-09-27 11:27
    - R packages Jack 2010-09-27 16:14
  - Is Exact exact? d_labes 2010-09-27 09:53