Protocol Deviation [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2011-11-16 19:11 (4926 d 00:02 ago) – Posting: # 7679
Views: 5,647

Dear Jaime!

❝ Unfortunately, maybe due to any cultural reason, it is difficult to get a positive return from some of the volunteers in these cases.


I think that this is not due to cultural differences. Subjects rarely ‘confess’ that they have violated study’s restrictions fearing they will never be included again (not without a cause…).

❝ But we are quite sure this was the case, since levels are almost 5% of the Cmax, which is compatible with taking a pill from 3 to 7 days earlier.


Even if you don’t get a positive response from the volunteer I would include this reasoning in the report.

❝ ❝ ... To be honest I have given up to fix the many broken links in the Guidance page. Do you have a working URL?


❝ I'll have a look, hoping to provide you the correct links nowadays.


THX, would be nice. I asked colleagues from ANVISA personally and by e-mail numerous times. They all agreed to help, but actually never did… :-D

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,671 registered users;
95 visitors (0 registered, 95 guests [including 62 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:13 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If you shut your door to all errors
truth will be shut out.    Rabindranath Tagore

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5