Redosing study… [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by H.Patel – 2011-06-15 18:28 (5485 d 04:25 ago) – Posting: # 7131
Views: 14,711

Hello All,

We did a Pivotal study… sample size: 26.
It failed in cmax due to one subject whose T/R=300% due to reference formulation.

we are planning a redosing study to see if the data of this subject was
abberant or not…
In redosing study we are planning to go with 6 subjects. equal TR and RT sequence

Ques1) Can we mention in protocol that we will take sub no 1, 4, 8, 9, 14, 22 in the redosing study or it will stand as a selection bias. This is bcoz the ratio of these subs are near to unity. This will help in making our control arm in study more strong.

Ques 2) What shall be the range of data wherein if the redosing data of postulated outlier falls, then it can be considered as abberant observation.


Edit: Category changed. [Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
145 visitors (0 registered, 145 guests [including 18 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:54 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5