Missing samples in terminal elimination phase [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Jaime_R – Barcelona, 2009-10-13 20:24 (6098 d 03:33 ago) – Posting: # 4349
Views: 8,274

Dear Yung-jin!

❝ ❝ Why didn't you use a truncated AUC72 approach?

❝ Since the study has been done, was it too late to switch to truncated AUC

❝ method?


Oh yes, sure. I should have added a :lol3: to my rhetorical question...

❝ ❝ You have some options [...]


❝ These are very nice suggestions [...] should be carefully considered

❝ when developing a BE study protocol.


Maybe. But I would put all efforts not running into such a situation, i.e. avoid sampling for one month.

Regards, Jaime

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
256 visitors (0 registered, 256 guests [including 149 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:58 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5