Missing samples in terminal elimination phase [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by yjlee168 Homepage – Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 2009-10-13 00:53 (6096 d 03:28 ago) – Posting: # 4343
Views: 8,412

Dear Jaime_R,

❝ Why didn't you use a truncated AUC72 approach? The rationale [...]



Since the study has been done, was it too late to switch to truncated AUC method? unless the protocol did not state the exact method... but it seems not possible.

❝ You have some options to deal with the problem (caution: don't evaluate [...]


These are very nice suggestions! :clap: These should be carefully considered when developing a BE study protocol. I've learned.

All the best,
-- Yung-jin Lee
bear v2.9.6:- created by Hsin-ya Lee & Yung-jin Lee
Kaohsiung, Taiwan https://www.pkpd168.com/bear
Download link (updated) -> here

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,572 registered users;
140 visitors (0 registered, 140 guests [including 39 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:21 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists cannot simply hang their subjectivities
up on a hook outside the laboratory door.    Ruth Bleier

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5