Missing samples in terminal elimination phase [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by yjlee168 Homepage – Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 2009-10-13 00:53 (5688 d 12:58 ago) – Posting: # 4343
Views: 6,837

Dear Jaime_R,

❝ Why didn't you use a truncated AUC72 approach? The rationale [...]



Since the study has been done, was it too late to switch to truncated AUC method? unless the protocol did not state the exact method... but it seems not possible.

❝ You have some options to deal with the problem (caution: don't evaluate [...]


These are very nice suggestions! :clap: These should be carefully considered when developing a BE study protocol. I've learned.

All the best,
-- Yung-jin Lee
bear v2.9.2:- created by Hsin-ya Lee & Yung-jin Lee
Kaohsiung, Taiwan https://www.pkpd168.com/bear
Download link (updated) -> here

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,669 registered users;
141 visitors (0 registered, 141 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:52 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

We should not speak so that it is possible
for the audience to understand us,
but so that it is impossible
for them to misunderstand us.    Quintilian

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5