Meets primary objective but not secondary objective [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by kratos – India, 2020-04-01 04:00 (2280 d 15:33 ago) – Posting: # 21312
Views: 4,602

Totally agree.
I cringe when some CROs state 'monitoring subject safety' as a secondary objective in a Bioequivalence study !

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
302 visitors (0 registered, 302 guests [including 21 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:34 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5