Revalidation? [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by mittyri  – Russia, 2019-12-18 17:52 (2383 d 18:55 ago) – Posting: # 20997
Views: 6,994

Hi Helmut and Dan,

❝ ❝ […] no detected concentrations in the predose samples for these subjects.

❝ Yep but the method was not sensitive enough for these subjects. Hence, I support Dan’s suggestion (exclude the subjects and check whether you still pass BE).


I heard about approach when the method is revalidated taking into account Cmax values of that subjects (LLOQ should be less than 5% min Cmax of those) and then the affected volunteers are reanalyzed (of course till the moment of database lock). What do you think?

Kind regards,
Mittyri

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,572 registered users;
291 visitors (0 registered, 291 guests [including 21 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:47 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5