Protocol / SAP? [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2016-03-15 15:32 (3748 d 21:04 ago) – Posting: # 16105
Views: 7,384

Dear Dan & Rams,

❝ So everything is fine.


Given the results, yes.

@Rams (nitpicking): Since you were aware that truncating the AUC is acceptable in most regulations nowadays, why did you calculate AUC0–∞ (and the fraction covered by AUC0–72) at all? What does your protocol / SAP say?
BTW, I assume that you are referring to arithmetic means? False for PK metrics following a discrete distribution (tmax); use medians instead. False for t½ as well; best would be harmonic means followed by geometric means.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
191 visitors (0 registered, 191 guests [including 70 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:36 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5