BE with PP-population [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2016-02-21 16:06 (3771 d 19:28 ago) – Posting: # 16016
Views: 9,004

Hi BE-proff,

the BE-assessment is always done with the PP-population. Imagine a single dose study where 2 × 50mg (Test) is compared to 1 × 100mg (Reference) and you discover that one subject managed it to spit one of the T-tablets into the toilet. Expected T/R 50%. Doesn’t make sense. Exclude the subject.
Same in steady state. If a subject didn’t take the drug(s) the T/R-ratio will be biased. The bias on the profile day will not be so dramatic as in the single dose example but it still exists. Whatever clever things you will do (e.g., PK-modeling,…) it is only exploratory. No regulator would buy that.
Subject wasn’t fully compliant ⇒ exclusion. Full stop.
However, the case is not lost. The impact of dropouts & excluded subjects on power is overrated. There are good chances that the study will still pass. Prepare for an inspection.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
186 visitors (0 registered, 186 guests [including 44 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:34 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5