Borderline BE study Failure [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Samaya B – India, 2014-10-14 11:02 (4272 d 14:47 ago) – Posting: # 13696
Views: 9,819

Dear All,

For Product X (IR tablets), full replicated BE study was performed on 56 volunteers under fasting state (EU submission).

When data for first half subjects (N: 28) was analysed, we got following results.
Cmax ratio: 87 (CI: 80.88-95.13)
AUC ratio: 87 (CI: 81.85-94.18)

Analysis of full data set (N: 56)
Cmax ratio: 84.32 (CI: 79.89-89.00)
AUC ratio: 86.9 (CI: 83.02-90.96)

%ISCV Cmax: 25
%ISCV AUC: 20
Power ~100
No outlier detected.

Is there any possibility to get through by any means or study to be repeated?
Or we should go ahead with the reformulation??
PROC GLM is used for stat calculation

Kindly advice.
Thanks!

Regards,
Samaya.


Edit: Category changed. [Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
152 visitors (0 registered, 152 guests [including 27 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:50 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The great tragedy of Science – the slaying
of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5