Results Analysis [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by unique_one – India, 2014-07-08 10:58 (4373 d 03:09 ago) – Posting: # 13234
Views: 23,194

Dear All,

Results obtained from 2 way-crossover study of 28 volunteers are as mentioned below:

90% CI AUC: Lower limit - 98.35, Upper limit - 132.50
90% CI Cmax: Lower limit - 95.38, Upper limit - 127.80

T/R ratio of AUC: 112.2
T/R ratio of Cmax: 109.5

Intrasubject CV% AUC: 27.3
Intrasubject CV% Cmax: 28.2

Questions:
  1. Primary reason for BE Failure?
  2. Do re-formulation would be needed?
Regards,
unique_one.


Edit: Category changed. [Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,572 registered users;
351 visitors (0 registered, 351 guests [including 17 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:08 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5